I was somewhat shocked by this article in The Herald this weekend.
No, it was not the poor spelling and grammar displayed on the placards. What do you expect from a “world-class” education system that teaches to the curriculum, not to the learner, and that doesn’t adequately meet the needs of the lower socio-economic groups in society? Moreover, having been on a protest where an ECE teacher held up a home-made placard that said “No to National Standars”, I understand how easy it is to make errors.
Maybe it was at this quote?
Busloads of Tongan Christians arrived in Mangere yesterday for the demonstration.
Well, yes, how ironic that busloads of followers of a religion that preaches tolerance should descend upon Mangere to demonstrate intolerance, but no, it was not that.
It was this:
Sio, told the crowd many people were not capable of understanding the objections to gay marriage. “Many New Zealanders will say: ‘What’s the big deal?’ You and I don’t necessarily have to defend that, because you and I have a perspective that is perhaps beyond most people’s perspective.”
That’s right, Labour MP, Su’a William Sio, the same MP who said Labour would lose Pacific Island votes if gay marriage was legalised, is now telling me that the reason I support gay marriage is because I don’t understand his reasons for opposing it. Oh, but he’s not going to tell us what those reasons are, because he doesn’t “necessarily have to defend that“.
We can debate the strategy and issue management involved around this issue, and we have, but what Sio is attempting to do is scare Labour into a U-turn for fear of losing votes, because he says so!
Sio must think he is untouchable and irreplaceable. Well, he isn’t!
If all Sio and his followers can bring to Labour is religious intolerance then I, for one party member, would be happy to show them all the door and wave them goodbye.
If these people are willing to sacrifice the larger ideology of Labour and the left (a better education system, a fairer tax system, more jobs, a more equitable society… ) for the sake of what will equate to roughly 250 same sex marriages a year, then we can live without them and they should all go and vote for the other guys and see how that works out for them.
Surely the 8500 divorces a year do more to harm the sanctity of marriage than more marriages would, but hey, I clearly don’t share his perspective.
- Labour Should Triangulate: Pt 1 — Business Tax
- Have the media called the 2014 election for Key already?
- John Key’s Cynical Triangulation on Education Reform Should not be Supported by the Left
- The Ideology of the Internet (Party)
- The War for the National Party Heats Up
- National – Building A Factless Future
- Born To Rule
- The Church and Human Rights – an awkward love story
- In Memory of A Star
- In the Name of the Market: Neoliberalism, New Zealand’s Electricity Sector, and NZPower
- Williamson isn’t entirely wrong on 3D printers
- Ashes to Ashes, Rust to Rust – The Iron Lady Is No More!
- With ‘Friends’ Like Eddie, Who Needs WhaleOil?
- Power to the People – What next for Labour and Asset Sales?
- The demise of an icon? [U]
- Labour and the nasty biased media | Your NZ on Have the media called the 2014 election for Key already?
- NZ Media Sails off the Deep End | The Left Estate on Have the media called the 2014 election for Key already?
- Media bias - The Standard on Have the media called the 2014 election for Key already?
- Welcome to National’s Brave New World of Education. « The Daily Blog on John Key’s Cynical Triangulation on Education Reform Should not be Supported by the Left
- Paul Bailey on The Ideology of the Internet (Party)
- Andre de Groot on The Ideology of the Internet (Party)
- Spin within spin. Laughable. (What? Simon Lusk AGAIN?) | The Paepae on The War for the National Party Heats Up
- David Koen on In the Name of the Market: Neoliberalism, New Zealand’s Electricity Sector, and NZPower
- The War for the National Party Heats Up - Recess Monkey on Born To Rule
- Kevin Hester (via Facebook) on The War for the National Party Heats Up